Mastering Multi-Module Navigation with Jetpack Navigation 3

 How to leverage the api/impl split and Jetpack Compose to build high-performance, multi-module Android apps.

Mastering Multi-Module Navigation with Jetpack Navigation 3

Building a large-scale Android app is like organizing a massive library. If you throw every book into one giant pile, finding anything becomes a nightmare. In Android development, that “pile” is the monolithic :app module.

As apps scale, modularization is the only way to keep build times low and developers sane. With Navigation 3, Google has introduced a Compose-first approach that treats navigation as a contract rather than a static graph.

The Strategy: The api and impl Split

The gold standard for modularization is separating what a feature can do from how it does it. This prevents “circular dependencies” and massive recompilation chains.

  • :feature:api: Contains Navigation Keys (destinations) and shared models. Other modules depend on this to know where they can go.
  • :feature:impl: Contains the heavy UI (Composables), ViewModels, and the "Entry Builder." This module remains hidden from other features.

Step 1: Defining Navigation Keys (The API)

In Navigation 3, every destination is a NavKey. To ensure these keys survive process death and handle state restoration, we mark them with @Serializable.

// In :feature:profile:api
@Serializable
data class ProfileKey(val userId: String) : NavKey

// Best Practice: If 'UserId' is a shared primitive, extract it
// into a :core:model module to keep feature APIs lean.

Step 2: Implementing the Destination (The Impl)

The impl module registers how a NavKey maps to a Composable. We use extension functions on EntryProviderScope to keep the UI logic private.

// In :feature:profile:impl
fun EntryProviderScope<NavKey>.profileEntryBuilder() {
entry<ProfileKey> { key ->
// ProfileScreen is internal to this module
ProfileScreen(userId = key.userId)
}
}

Step 3: Wiring it All Together in :app

The :app module acts as the "glue." It depends on all feature impl modules and assembles the final navigation provider.

// In :app
val appProvider = entryProvider {
profileEntryBuilder() // Provided by :feature:profile:impl
searchEntryBuilder() // Provided by :feature:search:impl
}

NavDisplay(
backstack = myBackstack,
entryProvider = appProvider
)

Scalability: Using Dependency Injection (Hilt/Dagger)

For massive projects, manually adding builders to :app is tedious. Using Dagger Multibindings, you can "contribute" these builders to a centralized set automatically.

To make this work cleanly, define a typealias for your contribution:

typealias EntryBuilder = EntryProviderScope<NavKey>.() -> Unit

Then, provide it in your feature module:

@Provides
@IntoSet
fun provideProfileBuilder(): EntryBuilder = { profileEntryBuilder() }

Note on Dynamic Delivery: This pattern is particularly powerful for Dynamic Feature Modules. Because the :app module only needs to know about the API at compile time, you can load the implementation and its corresponding EntryBuilder at runtime without breaking your navigation structure.

Why Navigation 3 is a Game Changer

  • No XML/Safe Args Bloat: Type safety is handled by Kotlin classes, removing the need for extra Gradle plugins.
  • Total State Control: The backstack is just a List<NavKey>. You can inspect, mutate, or save it as easily as any other UI state.
  • Parallel Builds: Since :feature:search:impl only knows about :feature:profile:api, changes to the Profile UI won't trigger a re-build of the Search module.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Can I still use Navigation 3 with Fragments?

Navigation 3 is built for Jetpack Compose. While interop exists, the library treats destinations as functions, making it most effective in 100% Compose environments.

How does this handle Deep Linking?

Navigation 3 provides the primitives, but doesn’t force a specific deep link strategy. Most teams parse the deep link at the entry point, map it to a NavKey, and manually update the backstack list.

Is the api/impl split overkill for small apps?

If your app is under 10 screens, a single module is fine. Start modularizing when your build times exceed 2 minutes or when multiple teams begin working on the same codebase.

What do you think?

  • How are you currently managing shared data classes between feature modules?
  • Would you prefer a manual entryProvider assembly for transparency, or a DI-based one for automation?
  • Are you planning to migrate from Navigation 2 (XML/Compose) to Navigation 3 soon?

Video Reference

For a deeper dive into the API design and adaptive layouts, check out: Navigation 3 API Overview & Demo (Android Dev Summit)

📘 Master Your Next Technical Interview

Since Java is the foundation of Android development, mastering DSA is essential. I highly recommend “Mastering Data Structures & Algorithms in Java”. It’s a focused roadmap covering 100+ coding challenges to help you ace your technical rounds.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Writing Massive when Statements: Master the State Pattern in Kotlin

Coroutines & Flows: 5 Critical Anti-Patterns That Are Secretly Slowing Down Your Android App

Master Time with Kotlin's Stable Timing API: Beyond System.nanoTime()